Industry blueprint

Predictive maintenance

Manufacturing, mining and fleets. Retrain on verified outcomes so false alerts fall instead of climb.

A model trained once on commissioning data degrades as equipment wears; false positives climb month by month. This design retrains on verified maintenance outcomes and measures false alerts before a model goes live. Live alerting stays in your existing monitoring.

Illustrative pipeline
STEP 01

Prepare signals

Pin sensor history windows and align them with verified outcomes from the maintenance system.

STEP 02

Train a candidate

Run the partner's time-series model on the pinned windows.

STEP 03

Measure false alerts

Score the candidate against the current model on held-out history.

STEP 04

Engineer approves

Go live only after a reliability engineer reviews the comparison.

What the record keeps

The sensor windows, the asset model, the verified outcomes, the candidate and its false-alert rate, and the approver.

Partner brings

  • Historian or OPC-UA access
  • Asset model and verified outcomes from the CMMS
  • Time-series model

Cairn brings

  • Pinned windows and quality checks
  • False-alert comparison on held-out history
  • Bounded retrain loop with approval
  • A record of every model that went live

Business value to test

False alerts, detection quality and time to a reviewed investigation.

Keep the decision explicit

A score opens an investigation; it never changes a setpoint. Record the model version and the engineer's conclusion.

Close the feedback loop

Each investigation's outcome becomes a label for the next candidate, which must cut false alerts before it replaces the current model.

Reference design, not a shipped domain pack. Live detection and alerting stay in your SCADA or monitoring vendor; this covers the retraining loop only.

See how failure can trigger a reviewed improvement cycle →

Cut false alerts, not investigations.

Talk about your sensor history, maintenance records and review workflow.