ML · ships today

Evaluate and
compare models

Score a model against your suites and flag what regressed against a baseline, direction-aware.

Ships as eval/score-a-model · training/closedbook-compare

Evaluation is the gate behind every other pipeline. Score a model on your benchmark suites, or compare a champion and a challenger on the same harness, and get a verdict a person can act on.

The pipeline
STEP 01

Choose the harness

Benchmark suites, or a closed-book QA set with per-split correct, hallucinated and abstained.

STEP 02

Score

Run the model, and the baseline if you supplied one, on the same questions.

STEP 03

Check the measurement

A gate confirms the comparison is valid before any verdict is read.

STEP 04

Verdict

eval/delta asks whether it gained; eval/forgetting asks whether it lost what the champion knew. A regression blocks.

What the record keeps

The models, the suite or QA set, per-split scores, the delta and forgetting verdicts, and the accept or reject decision.

Direction-aware

Lower-is-better metrics are not read backwards.

Forgetting is measured

A challenger that learned new facts but lost old ones is caught.

Measures only

Nothing is promoted or registered here; this pipeline produces evidence.

Ships as eval/score-a-model and training/closedbook-compare. Suites and judges depend on the installed operators.

See how failure can trigger a reviewed improvement cycle →

Run it on your own infrastructure.

Apache 2.0 licensed, self-hosted. cairn pipeline run eval/score-a-model